There are so many cool pieces in the Petrie Museum – while the pieces may not be as big or grand as the ones in the MET, Louvre, or British Museums, they are significant because they give a glimpse into the more subtle greatnesses in Egyptian society. Actually though, the โsister pieceโ to this one is actually in the MET!
This piece of limestone ๐๐๐๐ (dated c. 1353โ1336 B.C.E.) is what is known as a โtrial pieceโ – basically it was practice for the artist/sculptor before they made the real thing! This was found in the sculptorโs workshop at Amarna (in the southern ๐๐ ฑ๐ part of the city). While Tell el-Amarna is the modem name for the area, Akhenaten ๐๐๐๐ณ๐ ๐๐ named his new capital โAkhetatonโ or โHorizon of the Atenโ – the capital of Egypt ๐๐ ๐๐ was originally Thebes ๐๐๐ before the big move.
Petrie spent a lot of time excavating that part of the city during his time there from 1891-1892. Most of what we initially learned about the city and itโs architecture came from Petrieโs excavations. Fun Fact: Howard Carter assisted Petrie on these digs!
The piece unmistakably depicts Akhenaten ๐๐๐๐ณ๐ ๐๐. It is very easy to tell when Akhenaten ๐๐๐๐ณ๐ ๐๐ is being shown because of his very distinct facial features (pointed chin, long neck/face). It would also make sense that most of the artwork that was found at the sculptors workshop in his capital would contain art that depicted him, Nefertiti ๐๐๐๐ณ๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค๐๐๐ญ, the royal family, and the Aten ๐๐๐๐ณ.
This fragment of a limestone ๐๐๐๐ relief shows part of the cartouche for the pharaoh ๐๐ป Thutmosis I ๐ณ๐ป๐ฃ๐! Letโs take a look at his name ๐๐!
While Thutmosis Iโs birth name is usually written as (๐ ๐๐ด) this particular cartouche shows a variant of this name ๐๐. The full variant would most likely read (๐๐ ๐๐ด๐ค๐ฅ๐) which means โThoth is born, who has appeared perfectly.โ
Another variant of his birth name is (๐๐ ๐ณ๐๐๐) which means โThoth is born, who has appeared like Ra.โ The more popular variant of this birth name, (๐ ๐๐ด) simply means โThoth is born.โ
Thutmosis I ๐ณ๐ป๐ฃ๐ (this is his throne name -โGreat is the manifestation of the Soul of Raโ) was the third ๐ผ pharaoh ๐๐ป of the 18th Dynasty. Thutmosis I ๐ณ๐ป๐ฃ๐ was responsible for many successful military campaigns and building projects, including additions to the Temple of Amun ๐๐ ๐ at Karnak. Though, in my opinion, Thutmosis Iโs ๐ณ๐ป๐ฃ๐ most notable achievement is being Hatshepsutโs ๐๐ ๐๐น๐๐๐๐ผ๐ช father ๐๐๐!
This photo ๐๐ ฑ๐ has two ๐ป cool things: an interesting limestone ๐๐๐๐ piece that represents Anubis ๐๐๐ช๐ ฑ๐ฃ (left) and a wooden ๐ฑ๐๐บ piece that represents Osiris ๐น๐จ๐ญ (right). While neither piece is โgrand,โ they pose some interesting questions because they are quite unique!
Letโs start with Anubis ๐๐๐ช๐ ฑ๐ฃ (because heโs my favorite)! Anubis ๐๐๐ช๐ ฑ๐ฃ is seated on a shrine (very similar in style to one of his determinative โ๐ฃโ hieroglyphs ๐น๐๐ช). The ears are strange here because they are beautifully ๐ค carved, but the limestone ๐๐๐๐ between them was not cut away. Was this a stylistic choice or was the piece unfinished? We will probably never know! Anubis ๐๐๐ช๐ ฑ๐ฃ was found at Saqqara and dates to the 26th Dynasty.
The Osiris ๐น๐จ๐ญ piece is also a bit strange. It is a large wooden ๐ฑ๐๐บ figure that has been put into a base during modern times (to display easier). Osiris ๐น๐จ๐ญ is shown in his typical mummiform ๐๐น๐ ฑ๐พ way – wearing the Atef Crown ๐ and holding the crook ๐พ and flail ๐ in his hands. Whatโs interesting is that the figure is very โblockyโ – there are absolutely no fine details shown. Ancient Egyptian artists were known for fine details so again the question is: is the piece intended to look like this or is it incomplete? Osiris ๐น๐จ๐ญ is dated to the 30th Dynasty – Ptolemaic Period and was also found at Saqqara.
Also totally unrelated but you can see the ushabti ๐ท๐ฟ๐ฏ๐๐๐ฎ๐พ necklace from my previous post in the background of this picture ๐๐ ฑ๐!!
I love ancient Egyptian amulets ๐๐ช๐ ๐ช – probably because I love tiny objects! Amulets ๐๐ช๐ ๐ช were small objects wrapped within the bandages on a mummy ๐๐น๐ ฑ๐พ or worn by a living person. The purpose of the amulets was to protect the wearer with magic powers that were specific to that amulet ๐๐ช๐ . The amulets ๐๐ช๐ ๐ช were also supposed to aid in resurrection. Here in the British Museum, they had quite a nice display of some faience ๐ฃ๐๐๐ธ๐ผ amulets ๐๐ช๐ ๐ช! I love faience ๐ฃ๐๐๐ธ๐ผ pieces because I love their blue-green ๐ ๐๐ color! I also like this display because you can see different style variations!
The wedjat ๐ (Eye of Horus) is a very common symbol of protection ๐ ๐๐ก๐ and regeneration. The wedjat ๐ symbol was used by both the living and the dead ๐ ๐๐ฑ! Many people wore wedjat ๐ necklaces or rings ๐๐๐๐ช๐ฆ in order to invoke its powers of protection ๐ ๐๐ก๐. This very much shows how religion and fashion were very much related in Egypt ๐๐ ๐๐!
The Isis knot ๐ฌ is representative of a tied piece of cloth and is associated with the blood of Isis ๐จ๐๐ฅ (hence why red colored stones are usually used to make these amulets). It is a symbol of protection ๐ ๐๐ก๐ in the afterlife ๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐, and was usually placed at the neck of the deceased. Knots in Egypt ๐๐ ๐๐ were thought to release magic.
More ushabtis!!!! Most ushabti ๐ ฑ๐๐๐๐ญ๐พ figures are made of faience ๐ฃ๐๐๐ธ๐ผ, but can also be made out of wood, limestone ๐๐๐๐, calcite, terracotta and more rarely, bronze ๐๐ค๐๐ฆ. Today Iโm going to talk about bronze ๐๐ค๐๐ฆ ushabti ๐ ฑ๐๐๐๐ญ๐พ figures!
It is pretty rare to find bronze ๐๐ค๐๐ฆ ushabti ๐ ฑ๐๐๐๐ญ๐พ figures and there are not too many instances of archaeologists finding bronze ๐๐ค๐๐ฆ ones in tombs ๐๐ซ๐๐๐ฅ. Before the discovery of the royal tombs ๐๐ซ๐๐๐ฅ at Tanis ๐๐๐๐๐, only six ๐ฟ bronze ๐๐ค๐๐ฆ ushabti ๐ ฑ๐๐๐๐ญ๐พ figures had been found. One ๐บ was for the pharaoh Rameses II ๐๐ ๐๐๐ณ๐บ๐๐ด๐, and five ๐พ were for Rameses III ๐ณ๐๐ง๐๐๐ ๐.
The pharaoh ๐๐ป Psusennes I ๐๐ ๐๐ป๐ ฎ๐ผ๐๐๐ of the 21st Dynasty (c. 1000 B.C.E.) had many bronze ๐๐ค๐๐ฆ ushabti ๐ ฑ๐๐๐๐ญ๐พ figures made. The bronze ๐๐ค๐๐ฆ ushabtis ๐ ฑ๐๐๐๐ญ๐พ are in similar style to the โregularโ types of ushabti ๐ ฑ๐๐๐๐ญ๐พ figures made with more popular materials. They are mummiform, with the arms crossed on the chest with an inscription on the front. Psusennesโ ๐๐ ๐๐ป๐ ฎ๐ผ๐๐๐ ushabti ๐ ฑ๐๐๐๐ญ๐พ figures are distributed in museums around the world and are highly valued pieces despite their modest appearance!
Unrelated, but I love Psusennes Iโs ๐๐ ๐๐ป๐ ฎ๐ผ๐๐๐ name ๐๐! It translates to โ The star who has appeared in Nut, beloved of Amun.โ Sometimes, Nut ๐๐๐ is taken to mean โThebesโ in royal titularly. Nut ๐๐๐ฏ๐ญ is the goddess ๐น๐ of the sky ๐ช๐๐ฏ! Nut can be written as โ๐๐๐โ or โ๐๐๐ฏ๐ญโ (and there are other variations as well)!
One of the reasons I find ushabti ๐ ฑ๐๐๐๐ญ๐พ figures so fascinating is because they come in many different styles and can be made from many different types of materials. Most ushabti ๐ ฑ๐๐๐๐ญ๐พ figures are made of faience ๐ฃ๐๐๐ธ๐ผ, but can also be made out of wood, limestone ๐๐๐๐, calcite, terracotta and more rarely, bronze ๐๐ค๐๐ฆ. The faience ๐ฃ๐๐๐ธ๐ผ ushabti ๐ ฑ๐๐๐๐ญ๐พ figures can come in all different colors: blue ๐๐น๐๐ฟ๐ธ๐ฅ, red ๐ง๐๐๐ , green ๐ ๐ฟ๐๐, blue-green ๐ ๐๐, white ๐๐๐ณ and others!
I love how this display at the British Museum shows many different styles/colors of ushabtis ๐ท๐ฟ๐ฏ๐๐๐ฎ๐พ!
There are two ๐ป ways to write ushabti in hieroglyphs ๐น๐๐ช:
๐ท๐ฟ๐ฏ๐๐๐ฎ๐พ – ลกwbtj – the earlier word that was used in Egypt. ๐ ฑ๐๐๐๐ญ๐พ – wลกbtj – the โnewerโ form of the word. This is where the Egyptological term of โushabtiโ or โshabtiโ (both are correct terms to use) originated from!
So which version of the word do I use in my posts? Both! I like to mix it up! โ ๐ท๐ฟ๐ฏ๐๐๐ฎ๐พโ seems to be the version preferred by Allen, while โ ๐ ฑ๐๐๐๐ญ๐พโ seems to be more used by Budge and other earlier hieroglyphic dictionaries. I think itโs important to be able to recognize both versions for translation purposes! In English, my Nonno always said โushabtiโ so I always use it! I will rarely say/use โshabti.โ
This group of blue ๐๐น๐๐ฟ๐ธ๐ฅ glazed faience ๐ฃ๐๐๐ธ๐ผ ushabti ๐ ฑ๐๐๐๐ญ๐พ (or shabti) figures belonged to different โHigh Priests of Amun ๐น๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ณโ and their families. These ushabtis ๐ ฑ๐๐๐๐ญ๐พ were found in the Royal Cache at Deir el-Bahri and are dated to the 21-22 Dynasties (1070-925 B.C.E.).
The โHigh Priest of Amun ๐น๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ณโ was the top ranking priest ๐น๐ in the priesthood of the god ๐น Amun ๐๐ ๐. The High Priests of Amun ๐น๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ณ first appeared during the 18th Dynasty of the New Kingdom and gained a lot of power under Hatshepsut ๐๐ ๐๐น๐๐๐๐ผ๐ช and Thutmosis III ๐ณ๐ ๐ฃ. The Theban high priest was usually appointed by the pharaoh ๐๐ป. However, their power was curtailed when Akhenaten ๐๐๐๐ณ๐ ๐๐ came to the throne and changed the polytheistic Egyptian religion to the monotheistic worship ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ข of the Aten ๐๐๐๐ณ.
Though not officially pharaohs ๐๐ป๐ฆ themselves, The High Priests of Amun ๐น๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ณ during the 21st Dynasty were unofficial rulers of Upper Egypt ๐. Their names ๐๐๐ฆ even appeared in cartouches and they were buried in royal tombs ๐๐ซ๐๐๐ฆ. This partially explains why these particular ushabti ๐ ฑ๐๐๐๐ญ๐พ figures have the craftsmanship that would usually be reserved for royalty.
Here is a very nice raised relief in limestone ๐๐๐๐ which depicts pharaoh ๐๐ป Thutmosis III ๐ ๐ ๐ด wearing the blue crown ๐ฃ๐๐๐ (left). He can be identified based off of the hieroglyphs ๐น๐๐ช of his name ๐๐ that appear to his right.
Limestone relief of Thutmosis III in the Brooklyn Museum
Here are the hieroglyphs ๐น๐๐ช broken down:
๐ณ๐ ๐ฃ – Menkheperra (Thutmosis IIIโs throne name) ๐น๐ค – The Great God ๐๐ฟ๐ฟ – Lord of the Two Lands
Also on the right is the remnant of another person – most likely the pharaoh ๐๐ป Hatshepsut ๐๐ ๐๐น๐๐๐๐ผ๐ช (a portion of a shoulder and a crown are seen, so the presence of the crown allows us to infer that it is in fact another royal figure).
What is super interesting about this piece is that the images ๐๐ ฑ๐๐ฆ of the pharaohs ๐๐ป๐ฆ that are carved are not the actual pharaohs ๐๐ป๐ฆ themselves, but statues ๐๐๐๐ญ๐พ๐ช of them! This relief is depicting a religious precession that took place at Hatshepsutโs ๐๐ ๐๐น๐๐๐๐ผ๐ช mortuary temple at Deir el-Bahri ๐ฆ๐๐ฆ๐ฅ๐. This piece was excavated from the temple and is dated to c. 1478-1458 B.C.E.
Here is another example of a limestone ๐๐๐๐ relief of Thutmosis III ๐ ๐ ๐ด wearing the blue crown ๐ฃ๐๐๐. Menkheperra ๐ณ๐ ๐ฃ (Thutmosis IIIโs throne name) is above his head ๐ถ๐บ on the relief so we know that it is him! This one is in the Vatican Museum!
Limestone relief of Thutmosis III in the Vatican Museum
While many know that the Ankh ๐น is the symbol that corresponds with the word โLife,โ the Ankh ๐น had other symbolic meanings as well – one of which is shown on this relief fragment!
The Ankh ๐น can also symbolize the purifying ๐ด๐๐ power of water ๐. In many temples ๐๐๐๐ฆ in Egypt ๐๐ ๐๐, a pharaoh ๐๐ป (like Thutmosis III ๐ ๐ ๐ด here) is flanked by two ๐ป gods ๐น๐น๐น. One of the gods ๐น๐น๐น who did was was usually Thoth ๐ ๐๐ญ๐ญ, but it is impossible to tell which god ๐น is performing the action in this relief. The gods ๐น๐น๐น would pour a stream of Ankhs ๐น๐น๐น over his head ๐ถ๐บ to cleanse ๐ด๐๐ and purify ๐ด๐๐ him (Fun Fact: cleanse and purify can be the same word in hieroglyphs ๐น๐๐ช but there are other variations of each word too).
Totally unrelated thought but I have always loved the word for water (๐) because it is the โnโ symbol! Since my name ๐๐ is Nicole and my name would start with ๐ in hieroglyphs ๐น๐๐ช, as a kid ๐๐๐ I would refer to ๐ and ๐ as โmy symbolโ ๐.
Here is a limestone ๐๐๐๐ fragment of a parapet (c. 1352-1336 B.C.E., New Kingdom Amarna Period) that depicts the pharaoh ๐๐ป Akhenaten ๐๐๐๐ณ๐ ๐๐ and Nefertiti ๐๐๐๐ณ๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค๐๐๐ญ. A parapet is a low wall, and it may have been part of a temple ๐๐๐ at one point.
In the image ๐๐ ฑ๐, Nefertiti ๐๐๐๐ณ๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค๐๐๐ญ is offering cartouches to the Aten ๐๐๐๐ณ. These cartouches do not belong to Akhenaten ๐๐๐๐ณ๐ ๐๐, but to the Aten ๐๐๐๐ณ itself which is different because cartouches were usually for pharaohs. Also strange is that other gods ๐น๐น๐น are mentioned in the Atenโs ๐๐๐๐ณ cartouches, even while the Egyptian religion was banned. These might be early cartouches, before a complete ban took effect. There is also a lot of debate because does this mean that Akhenaten ๐๐๐๐ณ๐ ๐๐ was the Aten ๐๐๐๐ณ on Earth ๐พ๐พ, or were they two ๐ป separate beings?
Front side of the limestone parapet from Amarna
Here is a closer look at the cartouches:
(๐๐๐ ๐น๐๐๐ฎ๐๐๐) – โ “The living Re-Horakhty, Rejoicing in the horizon”
(๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ฑ๐ณ๐๐๐ฎ๐๐๐๐๐ณ) – โIn his name as Shu, who is in the Aten”
Also in the image๐๐ ฑ๐, Aten ๐๐๐๐ณ is extending light rays to Akhenaten ๐๐๐๐ณ๐ ๐๐ and Nefertiti ๐๐๐๐ณ๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค๐๐๐ญ. The light rays are represented by lines, with hands ๐ง๐๐ฆ on the end that are holding Ankhs ๐น๐น๐น.
Obverse side of the limestone parapet from Amarna
This is the obverse side of the limestone ๐๐๐๐ fragment of a parapet (c. 1352-1336 B.C.E., New Kingdom Amarna Period) that depicts the pharaoh ๐๐ป Akhenaten ๐๐๐๐ณ๐ ๐๐ (left) and Nefertiti ๐๐๐๐ณ๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค๐๐๐ญ (right).
The piece is in such poor condition because after the death ๐ ๐๐ฑ of Akhenaten ๐๐๐๐ณ๐ ๐๐, his city was abandoned and fell to disarray. This makes the hieroglyphs ๐น๐๐ช difficult to translate but I will try! Also, many of the buildings were destroyed by Rameses II ๐ฉ๐๐๐๐ด๐ and the materials were then used to build ๐๐ค๐ ฑ๐ด๐ง one of his temples ๐๐๐๐ฆ.
Letโs read some hieroglyphs ๐น๐๐ช! This is the third column from the left:
(๐๐๐๐ณ๐ ๐๐) – cartouche of Akhenaten ๐๐ป – โTrue of Voiceโ or โJustifiedโ ๐ข๐๐ณ๐ค – Lifetime ๐ – โheโ or โhisโ
โAkhenaten, true of voice, in his lifetimeโฆโ
There are many misconceptions about Hatshepsut ๐๐ ๐๐น๐๐๐๐ผ๐ช, and I want to show why they are misconceptions.
It was always said by historians that Hatshepsut ๐๐ ๐๐น๐๐๐๐ผ๐ช was โshowing herself as a maleโ or โtrying/wanting to be a man.โ These statements are just not true. Hatshepsut ๐๐ ๐๐น๐๐๐๐ผ๐ช never portrayed herself as a man ๐๐๐ค. She portrayed herself as a Pharaoh ๐๐ป, which she was! In fact, she very much referred to herself as a woman ๐๐๐๐๐. How do we know? Itโs all in the hieroglyphs ๐น๐๐ช!
Letโs take a look at the titles she gives herself.
The inscription reads: ๐ค๐น๐๐๐๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ณ๐ฆ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ผ๐ผ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ธ๐๐น๐๐
๐ค๐น๐ – โPerfect goddessโ ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฟ – โLady of the Two Landsโ ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ – โMaatkareโ (Hatshepsutโs throne name) ๐๐ ๐ – Amun ๐๐ผ๐ผ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฟ – Lord of the Thrones ๐ธ๐ – Beloved ๐น๐ – May She Live! ๐ – Eternity
So the inscription reads โPerfect goddess, lady of the two lands Maatkare, Beloved of Amun, Lord of the Thrones, May She Live, For Eternity.โ
If Hatshepsut ๐๐ ๐๐น๐๐๐๐ผ๐ช was referring to herself as a man ๐๐๐ค or trying to be a man ๐๐๐ค, the inscription would read like this:
๐ค๐น ๐๐ฟ๐ฟ ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ – โPerfect god, lord of the two lands Maatkare.โ
The addition of the โ๐โ makes the words the feminine version! โ๐ – Lordโ becomes โ๐๐ – Ladyโ and โ๐น -Godโ becomes โ ๐น๐ – Goddess.โ So as you can see, Hatshepsut ๐๐ ๐๐น๐๐๐๐ผ๐ช is very much referring to herself as a woman ๐๐๐๐๐ – itโs in the hieroglyphs ๐น๐๐ช!
Here is the other inscription that is on the statue:
The inscription reads:๐ ญ๐๐ณ๐๐๐ก๐๐(๐๐ ๐๐น๐๐๐๐ผ๐ช)๐๐ ๐๐ณ๐๐๐น๐ฅ๐ป๐๐น๐๐๐
๐ ญ๐๐ณ – Daughter of Ra ๐๐๐ก๐๐ – Bodily/Of Her Body (๐๐ ๐๐น๐๐๐๐ผ๐ช) – Hatshepsutโs cartouche (birth name) ๐๐ ๐๐ณ – Amun-Ra ๐๐ – King of (feminine form of King) ๐น๐ฅ – Gods ๐ป๐ – Beloved ๐น๐๐๐ – She Live Forever (forever is usually written as โ๐โ)
Put together, the inscription reads: โBodily daughter of Ra, Hatshepsut, beloved of Amun-Ra, King of the Gods, May She Live Forever.โ
Hatshepsut ๐๐ ๐๐น๐๐๐๐ผ๐ช is very much referring to herself as a woman ๐๐๐๐๐ – itโs in the hieroglyphs ๐น๐๐ช! If she called herself the โSon of Raโ the inscription would look like โ๐ ญ๐ณโ instead of โ๐ ญ๐๐ณ. โ The word for โbodily ๐๐๐ก๐๐โ is also feminized, and would be written as โ๐๐๐ก๐โ if it was referencing a male. The word for โking ๐โ is also written in the feminine form and has the โ๐โ at the end (๐๐).
There was no word for โqueenโ in Middle Egyptian, the closest word that exists is โ๐๐๐๐,โ which translates to โThe Kingโs Wife.โ Hatshepsut ๐๐ ๐๐น๐๐๐๐ผ๐ช was certainly not the Kingโs Wife: she was the pharaoh ๐๐ป/king ๐๐.
This misconception needs to be squashed, because it very much erases Hatshepsutโs ๐๐ ๐๐น๐๐๐๐ผ๐ช identity ๐๐ and as we know, the name/identity ๐๐ of a person was essential to Egyptian cultural beliefs. Referring to Hatshepsut ๐๐ ๐๐น๐๐๐๐ผ๐ช as anything but how she referred to herself is an insult to her.
